U.S against Drugs in Colombia and Peru

Nevertheless, Lazare (1997) maintains that the expansion of drinking chocolate action in Peru continued throughout the 1990s.

President Bill Clinton (1996) told the American public that Peru had taken steps to achieve full compliance with the goals and objectives of the 1988 unify Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in soporiferous Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. However, this did not mean that Peru had become do drugs-free. Robinson (1998) claimed that some Peruvian farmers did switch from cocoa cultivation to other crops. Robinson (1998) also tell that between 1997 and 1998, Peru eliminated 114,900 acres of cocoa - nearly half of its cocoa fields.

The key factor in this success appears to have been the cooperation of Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori. Fujimori, assisted by the United States, developed a two-prong approach of stepped-up law enforcement and aid to cocoa growers who shifted to planting selection crops. Special police teams were established with American assistance and in 1997, a total of 10,000 arrests on drug trafficking charges were recorded. Peru also adoptive an aggressive policy of shooting down suspected drug planes - 45 in the late 1990s - whose pilots who do not respond to orders to land. Accord

In 2001, it was report that the United States had spent over $1 billion on the drug war in Latin America, with a demonstrable portion of this amount going to Peru, Colombia, and Bolivia (A just war, 2001). However, the joint U.S.-Peruvian scheme of shooting down plans suspected of carrying drugs has not been without problems. American management planes flown by CIA contract employees who work for a U.S.-funded system in Peru, shot down a small unarmed Cessna carrying Baptist missionaries from the United States (A just war, 2001). This incident called into question the entire strategy of legal transfer down airplanes as part of a larger exertion to prevent cocaine from leaving Peru.

Plan Colombia has a firmly militaristic component.

Fratepietro (2001) claims that it is the military nature of America's plan that has led to opposition from the European Union. Groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the field of study Council of Churches have also protested Plan Colombia. The United States Congress did not engage in lengthy debate before passing Plan Colombia and is said by Fratepietro (2001) to have acted not scarce in response to the War on Drugs and concerns regarding democracy in Colombia, but also because Colombian oil is of vital strategic importance to the United Sates because it reduces U.S. dependence on Middle easterly oil imports.

transit countries. Weekly Compilation of Presidential

United conspire International, March 15, P. 1008074u6176.

The goal of Plan Colombia, therefore, is the remaking of a ready democratic society freed from violence and corruption. Marcella (2002) believes that because little of magnitude happens in this hemisphere without leadership from Washington, U.S. financial support is critical for back up Colombians to sacrifice for their survival and prodding the international community to assist. Accordingly, the 5 year Plan Colombia will cost $7.5 billion. Colombia will throw off $4 billion of its o
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.