Importance Of Validity And Reliability For Qualitative Researchers

Running head : harshness and Reliability for soft ResearchImportance of Validity and Reliability for Qualitative ResearchersIntroductionQualitative inquiry is the most popular look for procedure in the social acquaintances . But soft seekers ar continuously being confronted on the issues of validity and reliability of their research results . This issue among qualitative researchers has existed for more than five decades now (Atkinson et al , 2003 . In fact , recently , the issue has radically increase and it is not just an issue in UK , but globally (Seale , 2001 . This is due in part , to the scientific company oppugn the reliability and validity of qualitative research on which they trust to eventually discredit qualitative research resultsThe research community always calls for scientifically based research whichinvolves the application of rigorous info analysis to ravel the stated hypothesis . upgrade , this scientifically based research must be hi-fi and replicable to get reliable and valid knowledge . Moreover the research must employ rigorous data analysis to test the stated hypothesis (ESRC , 2002 . While this maybe true in quantitative research , it is not so in qualitative research . Testing hypotheses replicability and accuracy of procedures are not so important issues for qualitative researchers . This is basically due to the fact that qualitative and quantitative researches are two distinct research methodologiesThe Qualitative versus Quantitative Dichotomy in ResearchIn discussing techniques in social acquaintance research , there is often an assumed dichotomy amid qualitative and quantitative research . This kind of dichotomizing is headable . comparable Robert Frost , in his poem Mending Fences cardinal usher out question the wisdom of the oft-repeated saying , Good fences hold up sober neighbors Certainly , in research , and in social science research in particular , it is to be doubted if indeed trustworthy fences make good neighborsHuman beings do like to dichotomize , in all likelihood because so much of biological life is in pairs .

Binarity and enough division makes homo sapiens comfortable it enables him to get a handle on things he bottom whence make fruitful oppositions . Perhaps the same kind of criticism can be made of the dichotomy and distinction researchers make surrounded by quantitative and qualitative research . But what is necessary and sufficient - whether one is using numbers or verbal data and verbal data gathering techniques - is keenness . This beginning timber is a product almost of intuition , or insight - it is not yet clear from social philosophers , phenomenologists , and psychologists whether these two are one and the same , but what is obvious is that this insight is qualitative , not quantitative . To attempt to answer a question or to verify a hunch , there is then a whole panoply of tools and techniques one needs , some qualitative , some quantitativeHence , whether the supporting evidence is qualitative or quantitative the insight , which is qualitative , is supreme . One gathers data quantifies , tabulates , makes absolute frequency counts , find averages , then attempts to make room for error and to give the sack error and discount chance occurrences by tests of significance - sole(prenominal) because in to support a particular stance , one needs to do that . It is never the mindless...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .