Democracy

commonwealth was the most effective for the seventeenth and 18th century. The nation chose who the leader was, and they had match rights. They had a lot more(prenominal) license than Absolutism. Absolutism had ane ruler that had rules on exactly what you lot and cannot do. You were basically told what to do your whole life.             Absolutism didnt dissent for themselves, they were scared and didnt know what to do. The people were feared of their king and didnt indispensability to disobey him. The king was the only one who had phrase in what went on, and everyone listened to his command. The king also thought that God told him what to do. They had no rights and no freedom, if they didnt listen to the king, then they would be executed.              land defended each other and protected all their rights. They were free, equal, and independent. All the brasss were together, full now they separated into three branches, Executive, Legisla tive, and Judicial.

They are way more unionised and actually know what they are doing. This is why I would look with commonwealth, because they are a better form of government than despotism. Who would you involve as your government, one that will kill you if you come int do exactly what you are told to do? unity that doesnt defend you and keep you safe? Or one that gives you equal rights and freedom? Many people might face with absolutism and others will side with democracy, but in my imprint democracy was the most effective in the seventeenth and eighteenth century.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full informat! ion about our service, visit our page: write my essay