Impeachment of Andrew Johnson & Bill Clinton

Many in the dramatic art of Representatives also believed Johnson's actions constituted high crimes and misdemeanors, a vague manner found in Constitutional language in component 4 of Article II. For two days in February of 1868, the deputation on Reconstruction debated the move to impeach Johnson. On February 24, by 5:00pm, a balloting was taken and the resolution read, "Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, president of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors by a vote of 126 yeas to 47 nays."

The real source of contention between Johnson and those give away to impeach him was reconstruction and the handling of the grey states that had rebel lead in hurt of political power and the treatment of blacks. Republicans wanted to force Southern states to give blacks the vote, ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, and impose martial police force on them among other things. Johnson opposed this harsh treatment of the South, wherein Republicans had check all blacks would vote while excluding many whites from doing so. Congress led by Republicans also tried to diminish the power of the decision maker branch of government and the legislative branch by travel laws that forbade the executive branch to summon Congress, to fire officials (the raise of slip Act), and to give orders as commander-in-chief to the army. It also passed an act that took away the dogmatic Court's legislating powers in matters concerning Reconstruction. By firing Secretary Sta

nton against the voting of the Senate, Johnson was seen as being in violation of the Tenure of Office Act and this became one of the main charges against him in the impeachment trial that would result because of the poisonous atmosphere in Washington at this time, "By subsequently assuming to carry away the Secretary the president deliberately and distinctly violates the law which forbids the remotion of any civil officer appointed with the consent of the Senate without its consonance if it be in session. There could not be a more flagrant defiance of law or infringement of authority?The question ought, therefore, to be distinctly settled whether the President has the power of dispensing with the laws?

"

Johnson's hot tempered nature did not help oneself his cause any particularly among his enemies. However, he found the Tenure of Office Act unconstitutional and decided to completely contract it, and he knew Stanton was the bully of the Republicans to force the South into submission for their take ends, mainly getting the black vote to bolster their possess power as a party. Johnson gladly gave Stanton the boot. The Republican absolute majority retaliated by impeaching him under Article I, Sections 1, 2, and 5, of the Constitution. He was impeached for ?Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors', Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. lots like the Republican majority would come to hurl at President Clinton during his impeachment, Johnson was subjected to a torrent of personal abuse during the impeachment process. Charges from his pastime in the plot to assassinate President Lincoln to his goal to use the War Department to stage a putsch d'etat were lobbied at Johnson, all of them absurd. After a three month trial, Johnson was acquitted by one vote. The only negative consequences that resulted in the long run were suffered by those who led the witch-hunt against Johnson and the South, which was newly theorise along narrow and self-serving Republican lines.<
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.