Caesar & Richard Nixon as Leaders

As to "whether it is better to be loved more than feared, or feared more than loved . . . iodin ought to be both . . . but as it is difficult for the twain to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved" (Ebenstein 193). He observe that

men have less scruple in anger one who poses himself feared; for love is held by a chain of engagement which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purposes' but fear is keep by a dread of punishment which never fails (Ebenstein 194).

Lest his readers gene lay out the wrong lessons, Machiavelli urged leaders to be "cautious in believe and acting" . . . [and to] "proceed in a temperate expressive style with prudence and hu troopsity" (Ebenstein 193). He particularly urged a prince not to "make himself feared in such a way that if he does not gain love, he at any rate avoids hatred" (Ebenstein 194).

Caesar was born into a fairly prosperous blue family. He was exposed during his late childhood to the political conspiracies that enveloped primeval first century Rome. According to Duggan, he learned archaeozoic that "politics was a dangerous business in which goal was often the penalty of failure" (31). Caesar's illustrious military passage in command of Roman legions began later after he was 42. He briefly displayed his courage as a two-year-old officer at the age of 18 with the Army in Greece. He then went on during the next two decades to a promising care

Caesar and Nixon were adept in the use of power and placed more value on causing people to fear than to love them, which aided them to happen upon their aims as political leaders. They each would have been more boffo if they could have moderated their ambitions. Neither of them was very lovable.

Baldson, J. P. V. D. Julius Caesar. New York: Atheneum, 1967.

Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince (1513). rptd in bit and the State: Modern Political Ideas, ed. William Ebenstein, New York: Rinehart, 1947. 190-199.

Nixon, Richard M. Leaders: Profiles and Reminiscences of workforce Who Have Shaped the Modern World. New York: Warner Books, 1982.

Caesar was disarmingly frank intimately why he did what he did.

According to Balsdon, "In ad hominem relationships with men he was frank, forthcoming and utterly uninhibited" (57). Caesar openly enjoyed exercising dominion over others. He would not make much of a subject for psychiatric examination.

The conspiracy against Caesar that resulted in his being assassinated in the Senate in 44 include opportunists, disappointed office seekers and others such as Marcus Brutus who wished to restore liberty. In retrospect, there is little in the reforms introduced by Caesar which could have occasioned such a tragic ending to a brilliant career. It was rather, intimately historians agree, Caesar's manner, his intellectual arrogance and, as honors were heaped on him, Consul-elect for 10 years, dictator for life, and finally Imperator, it is little wonder that Caesar took on more and more of a haughty, imperial stance.

Richard . . . was a dark and brooding man --who saw no reason why the pursuit of 'great purposes' . . . should forestall savage action when it became necessary. 'Morality' to him, was an ambiguous concept, a seemingly culpable or cynical act, such as bombing a city, could have a ' moralistic goal,' just as seemingly moral acts could have immoral consequences --if a president did nothing (427-428).

Nixon is credibly the most comp
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.